HALAL CERTIFICATION MISUSE AND SUPPLY CHAIN FRAUD: THE CASE OF TAN KIMHOCK TONG SENG FOOD INDUSTRY SDN BHD V TAN KIM HOCK PRODUCT CENTRE & ANOR [2016] 7 MLJ 561
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/inslae-proceedings.334الكلمات المفتاحية:
Misuse Halal Logo، Trade Description Act، Halal Forensic، Supply Chain Fraudالملخص
This case study examines the Malaysian High Court case, Tan Kimhock Tong Seng Food Industry Sdn Bhd v Tan Kim Hock Product Centre & Anor [2016] 7 MLJ 561, through the lens of Halal Forensics. The core legal dispute involved an application for a Trade Description Order (TDO) under Section 9(1) and (2) of the Trade Description Act 2011 to address the disappearance of similar dodol products using counterfeit trademarks. Although traditionally viewed as an intellectual property conflict, this case exposed a critical weakness in the integrity of the Halal supply chain: the fraudulent misuse of the Halal certification mark permitted on products manufactured by non-certified third parties. By examining the legal framework, halal certification standard operating procedures, and the court’s strong rebuke of halal misrepresentation, this study highlights how commercial fraud undermines the halal and toyyiban aspects. Lastly, this article highlights the critical role that Halal Forensics which includes laboratory analysis and regulatory enforcement plays in protecting consumer rights and preserving the legitimacy of the worldwide halal market.
التنزيلات
المراجع
Abdul Rahman, N. A., Salleh, F. N., Mohd Sanusi, N., & Mohd Arsad, N. F. (2024). False trade description on product packaging: A case review of Public Prosecutor v Wee Mee Industries Co Sdn. Bhd. [1986] 1 MLJ 505. HALAL REVIEWS, 4(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.55265/halalreviews.v4i1.39
Adipven. (2022, 3 Ogos). Malaysia: Ownership, infringement, tort of passing off and common law. https://adipven.com/2022/08/03/malaysia-ownership-infringement-tort-of-passing-off-and-common-law/
Ahmad, F., Hussein, M. Z., Roslan, N. F., Husny, Z. J., & Rahim, N. S. A. (2016). A study on application of false trade description towards halal food products. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 5(3), 127–130.
Hassan, M. S. (2018). Forensik halal: Perspektif sains, syariah & perniagaan. Penerbit USIM.
Irwandi, M. A., & Ramli, N. (2020). The role of scientific analysis and laboratory testing in halal forensic investigations. Journal of Halal Science and Technology, 8(2), 115–128.
Jabatan Mufti Wilayah Persekutuan. (2018, 12 Oktober). Irsyad Al-Fatwa Siri Ke-263: Hukum menipu untuk tujuan marketing. https://www.muftiwp.gov.my/ms/artikel/irsyad-hukum/umum/2718-irsyad-al-fatwa-siri-ke-263-hukum-menipu-untuk-tujuan-marketing
Law, C. (2019, 28 Februari). Malaysia – Tan Kim Hock Product Centre Sdn Bhd & Anor v Tan Kim Hock Tong Seng Food Industry Sdn Bhd [2018] (Civil Appeal No 02-6-02/2016(W)). Conventus Law. https://conventuslaw.com/report/malaysia-tan-kim-hock-product-centre-sdn-bhd-anor/
Malaysia. (2011). Trade Descriptions Act 2011 (Act 730). WIPO Lex. https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/legislation/details/15309
Qing Chambers. (2024, 29 Januari). A guide to Malaysia’s Trade Descriptions Act 2011. https://qingchambers.wordpress.com/2024/01/29/a-guide-to-malaysias-trade-descriptions-act-2011/
Roslin, U. H., Razali, M. F. A., Mohd Ghazali, M. I., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2022). Three-dimensional (3D) printed food products from halal forensic perspective: A preliminary review. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 10(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol10no1.382
WJNT. (2023, 3 Ogos). The fight over a famous dodol mark: The Federal Court rules that a TDO may declare goods as imitation goods. https://www.wjnt-law.com/the-fight-over-a-famous-dodol-mark-the-federal-court-rules-that-a-tdo-may-declare-goods-as-imitation-goods/







