DUTY OF CARE IN FOOD ALLERGY CASES: A CASE REVIEW OF BHAMRA (SUING AS WIDOW AND ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF BHAMRA, DECEASED) v DUBB (t/a LUCKY CATERERS) [2010] EWCA Civ 13

المؤلفون

  • Muhammad Syihab Nokman Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), 71800, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. المؤلف

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/inslae-proceedings.312

الكلمات المفتاحية:

Food Allergy، Duty of Care، Negligence، Food Forensics، Allergen Management، Consumer Protection، Food Safety، Malaysian Food Law، Halalan Tayyiban

الملخص

Food allergies are one of the major risks posed to the safety of consumers and can lead to fatal anaphylactic shock. This paper discusses the case of Bhamra (suing as widow and administratrix of the estate of Bhamra, deceased) v Dubb (t/a Lucky Caterers) [2010] EWCA Civ 13, which revolves around the death of a guest who took a dessert that contained egg at a Sikh wedding reception, where food should have been in accordance with religious guidelines. The study provides a legal analysis of various aspects of duty of care, foreseeability, breach of duty of care, and causation in holding the food service providers liable. Further, it will look into the role of food forensic science in detection of allergens, verification of ingredients of food and their sources and finding out the causation by means of scientific methods like ELISA, PCR, and LC-MS/MS. Moreover, this paper highlights the use of various laws applicable in Malaysia in the scenario of a similar situation taking place there. The laws include Food Act 1983, Food Regulations 1985, Consumer Protection Act 1999, Contracts Act 1950, Trade Descriptions Act 2011, and the law of negligence. The research has proven that allergen control, ingredient labeling, food traceability, and food safety are critical components that must be fulfilled to ensure public safety and reduce the risk of liability.

التنزيلات

تنزيل البيانات ليس متاحًا بعد.

المراجع

Goldberg, J. C. P., & Zipursky, B. C. (2007). The moral of MacPherson. William and Mary Law Review, 49(6), 1733–1845.

Howells, G. (2005). The potential and limits of consumer empowerment by information. Journal of Law and Society, 32(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2005.00328.x

Ibn Mājah, M. Y. (t.t.). Sunan Ibn Majah (Hadis no. 2340).

Jackson, P. (2015). Food allergy and the law: Managing legal risk in food service operations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 49, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.05.001

Lees, M. (Ed.). (2003). Food authenticity and traceability. Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781855737181

O'Sullivan, J. (2010). From snail to egg: Duty of care, fault and food allergies. The Cambridge Law Journal, 69(3), 435–438. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197310000644

Pratten, J., & Towers, N. (2003). Food allergies: A problem for the catering industry. British Food Journal, 105(4/5), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700310477077

Sampson, H. A. (2003). Anaphylaxis and emergency treatment. Pediatrics, 111(Sup. 3), 1601–1608. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.111.S3.1601

Spink, J., & Moyer, D. C. (2011). Defining the public health threat of food fraud. Journal of Food Science, 76(9), R157–R163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02417.x

Stapleton, J. (1991). Duty of care and economic loss: A wider agenda. Law Quarterly Review, 107, 249–271.

World Health Organization. (2020). Food safety. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/food-safety

Yeung, R. M. W., & Morris, J. (2001). Food safety risk: Consumer perception and purchase behaviour. British Food Journal, 103(3), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700110386728

Zainal, N. T. N., & Haron, H. (2023). Perceptions, barriers and enablers on salt reduction in the out-of-home sectors in Malaysia (MySaltOH) from the perspective of street food vendors, caterers and consumers. Public Health Nutrition, 27(1), Artikel e12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898002300277X

منشور

2022-12-21

كيفية الاقتباس

DUTY OF CARE IN FOOD ALLERGY CASES: A CASE REVIEW OF BHAMRA (SUING AS WIDOW AND ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF BHAMRA, DECEASED) v DUBB (t/a LUCKY CATERERS) [2010] EWCA Civ 13. (2022). International Seminar on Syariah and Law (INSLA), 5(1), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.33102/inslae-proceedings.312