MISREPRESENTATION AND BREACH OF FOOD STANDARDS: NAM LEONG DEPARTMENT STORE (MIRI) SDN BHD V PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [2013] 2 MLJ 302
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/inslae-proceedings.304Keywords:
Nam Leong Department Store (Miri) Sdn Bhd v Public Prosecutor, Halal Forensics, Halalan Tayyiban, Food Act 1983, Strict Liability, Food Integrity, Supply Chain ComplianceAbstract
This case study provides comprehensive academic and practical insight into the High Court appeal NAM LEONG DEPARTMENT STORE (MIRI) SDN BHD V PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [2013] 2 MLJ 302 and the implications on food law, consumer protection law, supply chain compliance, and the new era of Halal forensic science. The appellant was charged under section 13B(1) read together with Section 13B(2)(e) of the Food Act 1983 and Regulation 285(3) of the Food Regulations 1985 for supply of fine salt that lack iodine levels (13.7 mg/kg as opposed to the legal average of 20-30 mg/kg). This study examines on how Malaysian law implementing by protecting the honesty and a strong moral principle of Halalan Toyyiban products. The discussion describes any companies cannot refer only on Halal certificatiom or agreement from their suppliers. They need to ensure that every steps are complying to halal standards and considering it with Malaysian law and Islamic values which demand transaprency and honesty. Importantly, the study also reveals that Halal forensic techniques such as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), chromatography and mass spectrometry help to identify fraud, contamination and non-halal ingredients. These techniques help to protect the supply chain as well as ensuring halal products stay safe and reliable.
Downloads
References
Baharuddin, A. S., Amin, N. S. M., Ruskam, A., & Yacob, A. R. (2022). Forensic determination of ethanol in import and local prepared vinegar for halal in accordance with Shafi’i school of jurisprudence. Food Research, 6(S3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.6(s3).010
Karim, R. A. (2021). The use of total quality management practices for Halalan Toyyiban of halal food products: Exploratory factor analysis. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 15(1), 1–22.
Lim Chin Aik v Regina [1963] 1 MLJ 50.
Malaysia. (1950). Akta Keterangan 1950 (Akta 56).
Malaysia. (1983). Akta Makanan 1983 (Akta 281).
Malaysia. (1985). Peraturan-Peraturan Makanan 1985 (P.U. (A) 437/1985).
Nam Leong Department Store (Miri) Sdn Bhd v Public Prosecutor [2013] 2 MLJ 302.
Neio Demirci, M., Soon, J. M., & Wallace, C. A. (2016). Positioning food safety in Halal Assurance. Food Control, 70, 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.05.059
Omar, E. N., Jaafar, H. S., & Osman, M. R. (2013). Halalan Toyyiban supply chain of the food industry. Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research, 1(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.24191/jeeir.v1i3.9127
Public Prosecutor v Koo Cheh Yew & Anor [1980] 2 MLJ 235.
Saad, N. A. (2020). Issue of Halalan Toyyiba in food supply chain among food handlers. Journal of Contemporary Islamic Studies, 5(1), 25–38.
Sosiawan, A., Rohman, A., & Zain, N. M. (2020). The use of displacement loop mtDNA in halal forensic investigation in Indonesia. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 13(3), 1069–1074. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00196.1
Yusop, M. H. M., & Bakar, M. F. A. (2020). Review on halal forensic: A focus on DNA-based methods for pork authentication. Food Research, 4(6), 2347–2354. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.4(6).180







