ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF EUTHANASIA ON NATIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE FROM MALAYSIA AND THE NETHERLANDS

الملخص

Euthanasia is the intentional act of ending the life of a person suffering from a terminal illness, typically at the patient's request. It remains a highly controversial issue, with compelling arguments on both sides of the debate. This study compares the legal frameworks governing euthanasia and end-of-life decisions in Malaysia and the Netherlands, alongside the ethical considerations and Shariah principles related to such decisions in both countries. It also examines the impact of euthanasia on patient care, including the provision of palliative care and end-of-life support services. In Malaysia, euthanasia is strictly prohibited, grounded in the belief that it violates the sanctity of life and poses risks of potential abuse. Conversely, in the Netherlands, euthanasia is legal under specific conditions—such as when a patient is terminally ill and experiencing unbearable suffering. The study finds that the legalization of euthanasia can yield both positive and negative consequences. While it may enhance the allocation of resources for palliative and end-of-life care, it could also lead to a decline in the quality of care for patients who do not qualify for euthanasia. This study concludes that the euthanasia debate is multifaceted and defies simple resolution. It is essential to consider the full spectrum of ethical, legal, and social implications before formulating any policy on its legalization. Further research is necessary to fully understand the broader effects of euthanasia on patients, families, healthcare systems, and society at large.